Saturday, February 13, 2010

Catholic Advocacy of Torture: a "teaching moment" for the Catholic Bishops?

NOTE: The following cross-posted to The American Catholic and First Things].

Writing at Vox Nova, the author known as "Morning's Minion" has published a post calling for consistency in the application of canon 915 -- the denial of Holy Communion to those who "obstinately persevere in manifest grave sin" -- in this particular case, the public advocacy of abortion and torture. The post was occasioned by the recent appearance of Mark Thiessien on Raymond Arroyo's "The World Over", in which the duo lobbied vigorously in defense of waterboarding:

I think the analogy is clear. Arroyo and Thiessen are both Catholic public figures, and Arroyo in particular is a TV personality on a Catholic TV channel, making the scandal all the more grave. They are clearly “obstinately persevering” in support for an intrinsically evil act. Worse, they actually try to justify it on Catholic grounds. Thiessen has made it his life’s work to claim that some forms of torture are virtuous. Arroyo, again and again, invites defenders of torture onto his show, and instead of confronting them with clear Church teaching, voices his agreement. As [Archbishop Raymond] Burke says, this is “public conduct” that is gravely sinful. I would go further and argue that it is even more scandalous than support for legalized abortion. Most public supporters of abortion do not go on television extolling the great virtues of abortion for women and society. Their argument is more with how it should be treated under the law. But the Arroyo-Thiessen-Sirico cabal are (i) claiming to the faithful Catholics while (ii) making public pronouncements on the positive value of torture.
Catholic debate over torture (and/or what the Bush administration has termed "extreme interrogation") has been going strong for several years now. It's online manifestation initiated -- to my recollection -- with the publication of Mark Shea's article in Crisis, "Toying with Evil: May a Catholic Advocate Torture?" and subsequent discussion at Amy Welborn's, in March 2005. From time to time I've personally blogged on the various vollies and controversies between various camps as the debate has asserted itself, time and again, over half a decade (has it really been that long?)

That EWTN ("Eternal Word Television Network") has hosted two explicit defenses of waterboarding -- most recently by Thiessien, as well as Fr. Joseph Sirico of the Acton Institute, not to mention Q&A from Judy Brown of the American Life League questioning whether torture should be considered "intrinsically evil" -- does not surprise me in the least. As I noted recently, there has been open dispute as to whether waterboarding constitutes torture from many prominent Catholics, including editor Deal Hudson, Catholic apologist Jimmy Akin, and Fr. Brian Harrison (in the pages of This Rock -- the flagship publication of Catholic Answers, the largest largest lay-run apostolates of Catholic apologetics and evangelization in the United States).

Little wonder that a Pew Forum survey examining "the religious dimensions of the torture debate" found many white Roman Catholics, along with most frequent churchgoers, affirming that the use of torture against terrorists is "sometimes" or "often" justifiable.

With respect to abortion, readers may recall a number of opportune moments during the 2008 presidential elections when Catholic bishops were obliged to speak out, publicly, forcefully and collectively, in correction of blatantly false presentations of Catholic teaching on abortion by Nancy Pelosi and (then) Senator Joseph Biden.

There have been numerous missed "teaching moments" for our bishops and the Catholic Church on the matter of torture. Bookmark and Share

2 comments:

  1. Isn't the first question what is torture?

    I don't think any thinking Catholic advocates torture. They just disagree with some that waterboarding is torture.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why am I not surprised that a lefty Catholic would effectively downplay the seriousness of the sin of abortion while playing up the seriousness of the sin of torture, arguing that it is more scandalous for someone to go on t.v. argue in favor of waterboarding terrorists than it is to argue on t.v. in favor of abortion. Once again we see one's personal political preferences dictating, or at least influencing, which doctrines of the Faith one will embrace and which doctrines one will downplay, explain away, or outright reject. It's just what I expect from Mornings Minion, whose left-leaning politics are far more prominent than his Catholic faith.

    ReplyDelete