Showing posts with label liturgy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label liturgy. Show all posts

Sunday, September 10, 2017

"Hemingway's Dark Night"

Hemingway’s Catholic and artistic vision contained many of the same philosophical and theological principles these other Catholic intellectuals supported. For instance, his affinity for the cathedral at Chartres, Saint Louis IX, the medieval town of Aigues-Mortes, Roland and Roncevaux, the pilgrimage to Santiago de Compostela, apparitions of the Virgin Mary, Mont-St.-Michel, and many other medieval figures and places exemplify the way Hemingway also wedded antiquity and the avant garde. His exemplary characters, after a profound recognition of original sin, always seek reconciliation with imperfection, yearning toward repentance through a form of traditional rituals: Jake Barnes acknowledges his wound and still prays, attends Mass, processions, and confession; Frederic Henry suffers the dark night while learning from the priest how to pray, how he may become very devout; Robert Jordan learns slowly and then all at once in that moment of conversion through la gloria, which ultimately leads to his sacrifice; and Santiago, the old fisherman, promises to say ten Hail Marys, ten Our Fathers, and to make a pilgrimage to the Virgin of Cobre if he catches the marlin. Hemingway’s interest in the poetry of Baudelaire and Villon paralleled his resistance of ennui through his quest to identify the sacred in ordinary moments of communion between friends, with wine and spirits and good meals, before the dark mystery returned in the night. And finally, the most mystical moments in Hemingway’s fiction are seen in ordered and disciplined action, which reveal the presence of mystery and actual grace in rituals like the bullfight, and sports like bicycle racing, hunting, fishing – in the act, like the great faena of the torero, “that takes a man out of himself and makes him feel immortal while it is proceeding, that gives him an ecstasy, that is, while momentary, as profound as any religious ecstasy; moving all the people in the ring together and increasing in emotional intensity as it proceeds” (Death in the Afternoon, 206-207).

Hemingway’s life would lead him on a continual quest for sacramentals, and Catholicism offered a confirmation of the sanctity of the world he lived in. His rejection of his parents’ piety was a rejection of sentimentality, of excess, of an over-emphasis on innocence, and the possibility that any man or woman can be perfect on earth. His rejection, evident in the above quoted letter to his mother from before the war, was theologically Catholic before he even encountered Catholicism. His characters and his stories attest to another piety, that which accepts the presence of sin and certain rituals of atonement, that which acknowledges imperfection while seeking, through grace, a joy in earthly objects as reflective of the heavenly good. This piety is contained in the image of Jesus and His compassion and mercy, His self-sacrifice for the salvation of humanity from sin. Or it can be found in the image of the pietà central to Christian mystery: the Blessed Virgin Mother holding her dead child Christ, an image which is at once a reminder of mankind’s imperfection through the death of Christ, our participation in his crucifixion, as it points toward a resurrection, an ultimate redemption.

-- Excerpted and adapted from the first chapter of Hemingway’s Dark Night: Catholic Influences and Intertextualities in the Work of Ernest Hemingway, by Matthew C. Nickel. New Street Communications, LLC (January 20, 2013).

Thursday, July 23, 2015

Iconoclasm in the heart of New York City.

Naked in New York: The Unceremonious Stripping of Our Saviour, by Steve Skojec. One Peter Five July 23, 2015. In 2001, Fr. Rutler is assigned to a parish struggling under the burden of millions of dollars of mortage and other repairs and over the course of twelve years, reverses its path -- bringing it back to financial health through careful stewardship, establishing the celebration of the Latin Mass and a stunning renovation of the interior with hand-made iconography from Chinese artist Ken Woo who spent six years of his life to the project, including 28-foot-high image of Christ Pantocrator. It becomes a center for liturgical, aesthetic and spiritual renewal.

In 2013, Fr. Rutler is reassigned. New pastor moves in, promptly does away with the Latin Mass, scolds his congregation for their backwardness and embarks upon a demolition of all the work that preceded him -- stripping Our Savior of its iconography (while vacationing in the Hamptons, no less), the parish now (once-again) mired in debt.

What's wrong with this picture?

I remember stumbling rather by surprise across this church while walking in Manhattan, entering the sanctuary and being completely stunned by what I encountered on the inside. The beauty of the altar and the iconography had to be seen to be believed. This was a rare treasure of NYC. …

As a Catholic it's just infuriating - reading this and the painful realization that this place will never be the same again.

But one needn't be a Catholic, Christian or even religious to be offended at the willful dismantling of a work of spiritual beauty AGAINST the collective wishes of his parishioners. ...

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Joseph Ratzinger - Collected Works: Theology of the Liturgy

Joseph Ratzinger-Collected Works: Theology of the Liturgy
Publisher: Ignatius Press (May 5, 2014). 700 pgs.

This major volume is a collection of the writings of Joseph Ratzinger (Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI) on the theology of the Liturgy of the Church, a subject of preeminence to him as a theologian, professor and spiritual writer. It brings together all his writings on the subject, short and long, giving his views on liturgical matters and questions over many years and from various perspectives.

He chose to have his writings on the Liturgy for the first volume published of his collected works (though listed as vol. 11) because, as he says in the Introduction: "The liturgy of the Church has been for me since my childhood the central reality of my life, and it became the center of my theological efforts. I chose fundamental theology as my field because I wanted first and foremost to examine thoroughly the question: Why do we believe? But also included from the beginning in this question was the other question of the right response to God and, thus, the question of the liturgy."

By starting with the theme of liturgy in this volume, Ratzinger wants to highlight God's primacy, the absolute precedence of the theme of God. Beginning with a focus on the liturgy, he said, tells us that "God is first". He quotes from the Rule of St. Benedict, "Nothing is to be preferred to the liturgy", as a way of ordering priorities for the life of the Church and of every individual. He says that the fundamental question of the man who begins to understand himself correctly is: How must I encounter God? Thus learning the right way of worshipping is the gift par excellence that is given to us by the faith.

The essential purpose of his writings on the liturgy is to place the liturgy in its larger context, which he presents in three concentric circles. First, the intrinsic interrelationship of Old and New Testament; without the connection to the Old Testament heritage, the Christian liturgy is incomprehensible. The second circle is the relationship to the religions of the world. The third circle is the cosmic character of the liturgy, which is more than the coming together of a circle of people: the liturgy is celebrated in the expanse of the cosmos, encompassing creation and history at the same time.

(As if there aren't already enough books on my "to read" list).

Saturday, January 2, 2010

"Is the SSPX Right about Vatican II?" -- A dialogue between Aidan Nichols and a "confused Catholic"

"Rome and the SSPX: a very puzzling dialogue" -- When Moyra Doorly began to wonder if the SSPX is right about Vatican II she asked leading theologian Aidan Nichols to address her doubts. The initial exchange was published July 3, 2009, and continues in the pages of the Catholic Herald (UK):

Saturday, August 22, 2009

Thus begins the "Reform of the Reform" ...

The USCCB has launched a new website introducing the Third Edition of the Roman Missal, which includes an updated translation of the English text of the mass:
The Missale Romanum (the Roman Missal), the ritual text for the celebration of the Mass, was first promulgated by Pope Paul VI in 1970 as the definitive text of the reformed liturgy of the Second Vatican Council. A second edition followed in 1975.

Pope John Paul II issued a revised version of the Missale Romanum during the Jubilee Year 2000. The English translation of the revised Roman Missal is nearing completion, and the Bishops of the United States will vote on the final sections of the text this November. Among other things, the revised edition of the Missale Romanum contains prayers for the observances of recently canonized saints, additional prefaces for the Eucharistic Prayers, additional Votive Masses and Masses and Prayers for Various Needs and Intentions, and some updated and revised rubrics (instructions) for the celebration of the Mass. The English translation of the Roman Missal will also include updated translations of existing prayers, including some of the well–known responses and acclamations of the people.

This website has been prepared to help you prepare for the transition. As this site continues to be expanded, you will find helpful resources for the faithful, for the clergy, and for parish and diocesan leaders.

May this process of the implementation of the revised Roman Missal be a time of deepening, nurturing, and celebrating our faith through our worship and the celebration of the Sacred Liturgy.

(Here are some examples of the changes afoot).

See also:

Saturday, July 7, 2007

“Motu Proprio” Summorum Pontificum

Responses & Commentary

Ongoing compilation . . .

  • Some Key Points of the Motu Proprio, Letter to Bishops and Explanatory Note - the highlights, conveniently assembled by Teresa Polk (Blog by the Sea).

  • Gerald Augustinus provides a translation of an excellent article in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung laying out the need for the moto proprio:
    Looking at the situation, Joseph Ratzinger is right. By now it's two generations of Catholics who sing new songs off copied sheets whose linguistic banality and musical vulgarity have reached the level of simplistic elevator music. So-called family Masses have replaced the Gospel reading with fairy tales from Ireland. Whoever resists these forms of self-secularization of the Church, is viewed as reactionary and 'pre-conciliar', even if he just insists that neither the liturgy of the Church should not be a training ground for clerical do-it-yourself men nor the sanctuary a stage on which unsettled priests, self-aggrandizing laypeople and 'equal-rights'-clamoring women fight their battles.

    Does this basic problem of the new liturgy consist only in an execution problem which could be solved through "liturgical education" or long documents such as "Sacramentum Caritatis" ? Can the break with tradition be healed by today's rescinding of the "prohibition" of the old Roman Rite by the Pope? [READ MORE]

  • Summorum Pontificum: my intro comments and the text, by Fr. John Zuhlsdorf. What Does Prayer Really Say; also, see his response to Cardinal Ricard's hand-wringing:
    [Cardinal Ricard]: Not all priests are adequately prepared for this. They lack formation.

    [Fr. Z.] Priests are smart. We can learn. I will teach any priest how to say the older Mass and help him with Latin. This is not astrophysics.

    [Cardinal Ricard]: Books are lacking.

    [Fr. Z.] Print new ones? We have the resources of entire conferences of bishops to back this initiative if the spirit of this MP is embraced.

    [Cardinal Ricard]: Priests will have to prepare two homilies.

    [Fr. Z.] How ‘bout… make ‘em a little shorter?

    . . . . and so on.

  • Brief Summary of the Pre and Post MP Scenarios - Shawn Tribe (The New Liturgical Movement) provides a concise look at the implications. Spelled out in this manner, one can see just how significant (and a blessing) this document is.

    Also "testimony time": Why are people so excited about this motu proprio and the freedom of the 1962 Missal?

    Between Fr. Z, Rorate-Caeli and The New Liturgical Movement, you can find your fill of news and commentary on this topic. They have been blogging in anticipation of this day for a looooooong time, and -- to quote Shawn Tribe -- can rightly say "Rejoice!":

    You have witnessed a moment of history today. Rejoice, celebrate and soak it in. Lest anyone worry about it being anti-climactic from here, worry not. Once the celebrations are complete, be prepared, we have much work to do. We have scholas to build, priests to help get training and resources to, and much more. But do celebrate for awhile yet and enjoy the moment!
  • "Ten Questions on the Ordinary and Extraordinary Forms of the Missale Romanum", by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). (The U.S. Bishops also offer a 12 page discussion of the Moto Proprio [.pdf format], which includes another Q&A list of "Twenty Questions on the Apostolic Letter Summorum Pontificum."

  • 'Being Heard' John Heard - 'Summorum Pontificum', Young Catholics And The Roman Rite, by John Heard. Dreadnought July 6, 2007:
    Certainly, even before the Pope’s motu proprio, many young people had developed a sense of alarm about liturgical reform. Faced with what the Pope has called ‘arbitrary deformations of the liturgy’ in the years since Vatican II, young people have looked at the Catholic liturgical past and sometimes regretted the way our liturgical present fails to match up.

    We are, after all, the generation who grew up with the Clown Mass, too many emcee-style priests and homoactivist protesters inside the cathedral.

    That the 1970 Missal proved to be vulnerable in the hands of such people has been a cause of great concern but not a reason to doubt the Council itself. Rather, it spoke to a necessary ‘reform of the reform’, an ongoing process of education and discipline, but not a reactionary break.

    By liberalising the use of the 1962 Missal, the object is not then the scrapping of the ‘new’ Mass, rather a perfecting of the Roman Rite as a whole and a way of more perfectly implementing the teachings of Vatican II on the liturgy, in their entirety.

  • As to be expected, "Moto Proprio Madness", by Fr. O'Leary. (And, appropriately, a fisking of Fr. O'Leary's Response to the Motu Proprio by Barbara Nicolosi (Church of the Masses).

As for the overall mood in St. Blog's Parish, I think this about sums it up:

Lastly, as Dr. Blosser (Pertinacious Papist) reminds us: let's pray for our pope!:

Many of us have long awaited and prayed for this day. Let us remember the Holy Father in our prayers. Let us also pray for the impossible, for a warm and welcoming reception of the Holy Father's Motu Proprio.

Let us also pray for joy -- joy on this occasion, as well as joy in the good will and wisdom of the Holy Father in leading the Church to this pass. Finally, whatever its reception, let us pray that the Motu Proprio may, in due course, powerfully help to facilitate a renewal of liturgical faith throughout the Church and a renewed desire to worship God in the spirit of truth, which is the root of all liturgical renewal.

Monday, July 2, 2007

So about that Motu Propio . . .

  • From the Vatican Information Service:
    "Yesterday afternoon in the Vatican, a meeting was held under the presidency of the Cardinal Secretary of State in which the content and spirit of the Holy Father's forthcoming 'Motu Proprio' on the use of the Missal promulgated by John XXIII in 1962 was explained to representatives from various episcopal conferences. The Holy Father also arrived to greet those present, spending nearly an hour in deep conversation with them.

    "The publication of the document - which will be accompanied by an extensive personal letter from the Holy Father to individual bishops - is expected within a few days, once the document itself has been sent to all the bishops with an indication of when it will come into effect." OP/MOTU PROPRIO/...VIS 070628 (180)

  • "Draft Five, Brief One" Whispers in the Loggia 6/29/07: "Word's been creeping out over The Document... so, as promised, here's a review of (credible) things as they stand."

  • American Papist on the "not so bad" coverage in the New York Times, and the really bad coverage from Reuters -- as in:
    "Pope Benedict will tell Roman Catholic priests in coming days that they can say mass in Latin as a concession to traditionalists.

    However, the move has raised concern about reviving parts of the old liturgy that Jews consider anti-Semitic."

    *groan* How's that for an opening line?

  • At a glance: Differences between Tridentine Mass, Mass said today Catholic News Service June 28, 2007. "Here at a glance are the basic differences between the Tridentine Mass, promulgated in 1570, and the Roman Missal published in 1969 in response to the reforms called for by the Second Vatican Council . . ."

  • Benedict and the Mass: "A reflection on the meaning of the Mass, and a comment on the debate over the restoration of the old liturgy", by Dr. Robert Moynihan. Inside the Vatican June-July 2007:
    It seems that Benedict, like many thoughtful believers, is concerned about the fact that the conciliar reform of the liturgy in the 1960s has in some way apparently failed to achieve its chief goal, which was to bring about an even greater reverence for the Eucharist, an even greater participation by the faithful in the mystery of Christ, an even deeper sacramental life within the Church. (That is what the conciliar fathers hoped to accomplish by approving a liturgical reform.)

    And if there are in the "old Mass," as many argue, qualities too hastily discarded in the 1960s -- a sense of tradition which made it a bit easier for some to turn their minds toward the eternal, a sense of solemnity which helped some to turn their hearts toward God -- and if that loss can, even if only in part, be made good, if it can be remedied, by a motu proprio allowing the "old Mass" to be celebrated more widely, then it is a work of great import for the Pope to carry out.

    If the "old Mass" is merely a "cultural" matter, the fad of a small elite, it will not flourish in any case, and the motu proprio will be a dead letter. But if it is a matter of renewing the Church, and if the dignity and holiness of the old rite strikes the faithful in such a way as to re-kindle in them a sense of that devotion which prepares them to encounter Christ, then allowing the old Mass to be celebrated more widely will be an act worth preparing for with much toil and care.

For ongoing commentary on this most significant of events I direct you to the knowledgeable Rorate-Caeli, Fr. (What Does Prayer Really Say?) and (but of course), The New Liturgical Movement.

Lastly, good advice from Shawn Tribe:

As a point of note, we are entering into a period where the Devil will certainly be trying to sow discord rather than see greater unity and progress accomplished. One can sense it even here in the comments of the past day. Anything that is of great good can be attacked, and the angles of attack are from all sides -- meaning we too can be unwitting contributors to such. Brother may even attack brother. We need to resist this steadfastly more than ever.

The liturgical issue is front and centre. There has been much battle done, and emotions can run high. Indeed, recall Fr. Zuhlsdorf's now famed "rules of engagement" as well. Be joyful. Celebrate! Let that shine through so that the excitement might become contagious. But while we do that, guard also against pettiness, mischaracterizations, accusations, polemics and needless absolutizations when disagreements are raised.

Let's keep our wits about us and wear fraternal charity on our sleeve.

Monday, May 5, 2003

William Bentley Ball: "Him, not Hymn"

William Bentley Ball wrote an essay in Homiletic & Pastoral Review titled "Him, not hymn", questioning the necessity of requiring the congregation to sing during reception of communion:
. . . there is another aspect of reception [of communion]: listening. We do need silence for that - silence not only from enforced singing but silence for our own yapping minds even though they try to be engaged in prayer. John Paul II recently stressed this very point. The hymn-singing obviously blocks the profounder reception of hearing what Christ may have to say to us. "Sorry, dear Jesus -- no chance to hear you. I’m told to spend these critically precious moments telling you, doing all the talking -- not hearing you." [. . .]

Either we are faced, at the Mass, with the reality of the actual Person of Christ coming to us in Communion, or we are faced with a gathering, an assembly, a prayer meeting. Now, the General Instruction does tell us that singing during reception is "an act of community." . . . Group-singing may help [restore a sense of community], but when it preempts prayer or obliterates reception, it attacks the essence of the Eucharist -- the Real Presence. To be a community heedless of that, simply in order to be in some sense, a "community" is not only pointless but destructive of the Faith.

I read this some time ago and agreed with it then, and recent experiences at Mass prompt me to once more appreciate William's proposal.

This is especially the case where, as I witnessed, many members are not singing at all (perhaps because they can't follow along with the contemporary melody), and a good portion of the congregation seems inclined to kneel directly following communion and make an attempt to pray.

If there is a single part of the service that might benefit from the institution of silence, a brief time for quiet reflection and prayer, or at least musical accompaniment without words, this seems to be the case.

What do other parishioners feel about this? Pastors? Musical directors?

Monday, April 28, 2003

Here's an interesting historical note on the Jewish roots of Gregorian Chant:
Paragraph 114 adds: “The treasure of sacred music is to be preserved and fostered with great care.” Then in paragraph 116 we find another shocker: “The Church acknowledges Gregorian Chant as specially suited to the Roman Liturgy. Therefore, other things being equal, it should be given pride of place in liturgical services.” That’s what the Council actually said. If you are in a parish which prides itself on living the spirit of Vatican II, then you should be singing Gregorian chant at your parish. And if you’re not singing the Gregorian Chant, you’re not following the specific mandate of the Second Vatican Council.

Now, just a little footnote on the Gregorian Chant. In reflecting on these things about Church music, I began to think about the Psalms a few years back. And a very obvious idea suddenly struck me. Why it didn’t come earlier I don’t know, but the fact is that the Psalms are songs. Every one of the 150 Psalms is meant to be sung; and was sung by the Jews. When this thought came to me, I immediately called a friend, a rabbi in San Francisco who runs the Hebrew School, and I asked, “Do you sing the Psalms at your synagogue?” “Well, no, we recite them,” he said. “Do you know what they sounded like when they were sung in the Old Testament times and the time of Jesus and the Apostles?” I asked. He said, “No, but why don’t you call this company in Upstate New York. They publish Hebrew music, and they may know.”

So, I called the company and they said, “We don’t know; call 1-800-JUDAISM.” So I did. And I got an information center for Jewish traditions, and they didn’t know either. But they said, “You call this music teacher in Manhattan. He will know.” So, I called this wonderful rabbi in Manhattan and we had a long conversation. At the end, I said, “I want to bring some focus to this, can you give me any idea what it sounded like when Jesus and his Apostles sang the Psalms?” He said, “Of course, Father. It sounded like Gregorian Chant. You got it from us.”

I was amazed. I called Professor William Mart, a Professor of Music at Stanford University and a friend. I said, “Bill, is this true?” He said, “Yes. The Psalm tones have their roots in ancient Jewish hymnody and psalmody.” So, you know something? If you sing the Psalms at Mass with the Gregorian tones, you are as close as you can get to praying with Jesus and Mary. They sang the Psalms in tones that have come down to us today in Gregorian Chant.

"The Mass of Vatican II", by Fr. Joseph Fessio.
Catholic Dossier 5 no. 5 (September/October 2000): 12-20.